Does using the workspace waive privilege?

No one can promise a privilege outcome, and we will not. The split is live: Heppner found waiver on a client's self-directed consumer-AI use, Warner v. Gilbarco protected counsel-directed work product. Both turn on control. We build to the protective side of that line: no-training contracts, counsel direction, confidentiality, a complete record. The Kovel posture your ethics counsel would want.

Do associates get the same AI quality as the public tools?

Yes. The workspace runs frontier models under an enterprise no-training contract. Your associates get the capability they would reach for anyway, inside infrastructure the firm controls. Parity is the point.

What does the firm see vs. what does the client see?

Clients see your branding and their own matter. Your attorneys see every query and response in a dashboard, and everything writes to the matter file automatically.

How do clients get access?

A temporary link at engagement, a branded subdomain, or a mobile app. Conflict checks run before anyone gets in.

How is this different from Claude Enterprise or ChatGPT Enterprise?

Those give your attorneys a chat box. This gives your attorneys and your clients one workspace, scoped to the matter, with your firm's knowledge behind the answers and every exchange on the record.

How is this different from Harvey or Legora?

Those are built for the largest firms at enterprise prices. We build the same architecture for firms of 1 to 50 attorneys, at a flat monthly price.

Can a small firm actually afford this?

Yes, that is the point. Flat $490 per month for the whole firm plus a one-time setup from $1,500. Most 5-attorney firms pay more than that for case management software.

Can attorneys review answers before clients see them?

If you want. Full pass-through, daily review, or specific categories held for attorney review. Your policy, and the audit log proves it was followed.

What about conflicts between adverse clients?

Each client is isolated to their own matter at the data layer, not just by policy. Conflict checks run at signup and at session start.

Where does this sit with ABA Formal Opinion 512?

Opinion 512 puts the confidentiality burden on self-learning tools that train on inputs. Our no-training contracts and access controls keep you off that trigger, with an audit log you can hand to ethics counsel.

What if a non-client tries to get in?

They get a polite "contact the firm" page. No engagement letter on file, no answers.

Privileged AI Workspace · for law firms

A secured AI workspace for your firm. Privileged by design.

Your attorneys and associates work in a firm-controlled AI environment, with no-training contracts and full matter isolation. Then they share a temporary link so a client can ask about their own matter, without the privilege-waiving risk of a public chatbot.

See pricing ↓

✓ Frontier models, enterprise terms✓ Per-matter access control✓ Logged to the matter file

portal.yourfirm.com

Your Firm LLP · Client PortalMatter #2026-118

Can you flag anything unusual in this vendor MSA?

Two clauses differ from your firm's standard terms. Section 8.2 caps liability below the floor your firm usually accepts…Based on 12 prior MSAs in your matter file

Logged to matter file · visible to your team

Partner view

3 new client questions today

“Can you flag anything unusual in this MSA?”“Summarize every indemnity clause across these twelve agreements”“What does this indemnification clause actually mean?”“Draft a deposition outline from this transcript”“Is this severance offer normal?”“Pull every change of control provision in the data room”“Can my landlord actually do this?”“Compare this NDA against our standard form”

The problem

Privilege is only as safe as the tool it is typed into.

When a client or an associate runs the matter through a public chatbot, the firm can lose the privilege and the record in a single keystroke. Heppner (SDNY) put a federal stamp on it. The workspace moves where that work happens, not whether it happens.

Public chatbotchatgpt.com

Sure. A few clauses here are worth a closer look, though you should confirm with a lawyer…

✕Stored on the vendor's servers

✕May be used to train future models

✕No attorney ever sees it

Outside your firm · no record

Your Firm LLP · Client Portalportal.yourfirm.com

Two clauses differ from your firm's standard terms. Section 8.2 caps liability below your usual floor…Based on 12 prior MSAs in your matter file

✓Identity verified, conflict check passed

✓No-training contract with the AI vendor

✓Logged to matter #2026-118, visible to your team

Inside your firm · on the record

Same question. One copy goes to a stranger's server. The other stays with your firm.

A day in the workspace

Your firm works. Your clients ask. You see all of it.

8:40am

An associate opens the workspace

Priya runs the morning's MSA review inside the workspace. The same frontier model she would reach for anywhere, on the firm's no-training contract, scoped to the matter.

9:12am

A client follows a link

Sarah opens a temporary link from her engagement email and asks about an indemnification clause. She sees her own matter and public law, nothing adjacent.

9:14am

It lands in the matter file

The exchange writes to the matter file and the assigned associate picks it up in the morning queue. Nothing happens off the record.

4:30pm

A partner reads the signal

Three questions this week about the same acquisition target. That is a call worth making.

Why firms want it

Built for the firm, not just the client.

Client view: this matter only

Each client sees only their matter

You set the access levels. Clients get their own matter and public law, never anything adjacent. Conflicts stay walled at the data layer, not by policy.

Frontier model · no-training contract

The model they would use anyway

Frontier capability for associates and clients alike, on an enterprise no-training contract. Parity with the public tools, none of the exposure.

Logged to matter #2026-118 ✓

Nothing happens off the books

Every question and every answer lands in the matter file automatically. The record keeps itself.

No overselling

We're the AI team. Not your lawyers.

We are engineers. We set up the portal under your firm's name, put it in writing that the AI companies cannot keep or learn from your clients' conversations, save every exchange to the right case file, and teach your team to run it. Anything legal stays with your ethics counsel. If they want something changed, we change it.

✓ Your branding✓ Your data stays yours✓ Everything on the record

Directed by your firm

Access lives inside an active engagement, on your terms, under your direction. The Kovel posture, by design. No engagement, no access.

Confidential by contract

Enterprise no-training agreements with the model providers, single-tenant infrastructure, customer-managed keys. Rule 1.6's self-learning trigger never fires.

Scoped to the matter

You set the access levels. Each client sees their own matter and public law, nothing adjacent. Conflicts stay walled at the data layer, not by policy.

Logged, always

Every exchange lands in the matter file behind a write-once audit log. The record your ethics counsel asks for, already kept.

Built to the conditions the February 2026 rulings describe.

Heppner (SDNY): a client's consumer-AI use waived privilege, no counsel direction and no confidentiality. Warner v. Gilbarco (E.D. Mich.): counsel-directed work product held protected. We build to the protective side of that line: Rule 1.6, ABA 512, Kovel agency.

Analyses: White & Case, Proskauer, Perkins Coie

Pricing

Priced so small firms can run it.

Enterprise legal AI platforms reportedly start near $1,000 per seat per month. We built the workspace so a 3-attorney firm can run the same architecture as a 300-attorney firm. The briefing is free. Every engagement is fixed scope, fixed fee. No per-seat math.

Built for small firms

Small Firm Portal

$490

per month, flat

+ one-time setup from $1,500

Firms of 1 to 10 attorneys. Branded portal, no-training AI, full audit log. Live in about 3 weeks.

Practice Area Pilot

Fixed fee

after discovery

scoped to the pilot

Mid-size firms. One practice area or anchor client live in about 8 weeks, with your case files wired in.

Firm-wide & Managed

Custom

flat retainer

scoped to your firm

Rollout across practice areas, plus managed operations on a flat retainer. We run it, you keep the relationship.

The Founding Firm Program. We are onboarding a small group of founding firms: pricing locked for 24 months, ethics counsel review included, and a direct line to the people who built it. No invented case studies on this page. In return we ask for honest feedback and, if the portal earns it, a testimonial with your firm's name on it.

Free 30 minute briefing first. No commitment.

Questions firms ask

Honest answers, no fine print.

Does using the workspace waive privilege?: No one can promise a privilege outcome, and we will not. The split is live: Heppner found waiver on a client's self-directed consumer-AI use, Warner v. Gilbarco protected counsel-directed work product. Both turn on control. We build to the protective side of that line: no-training contracts, counsel direction, confidentiality, a complete record. The Kovel posture your ethics counsel would want.
Do associates get the same AI quality as the public tools?: Yes. The workspace runs frontier models under an enterprise no-training contract. Your associates get the capability they would reach for anyway, inside infrastructure the firm controls. Parity is the point.
What does the firm see vs. what does the client see?: Clients see your branding and their own matter. Your attorneys see every query and response in a dashboard, and everything writes to the matter file automatically.
How do clients get access?: A temporary link at engagement, a branded subdomain, or a mobile app. Conflict checks run before anyone gets in.
How is this different from Claude Enterprise or ChatGPT Enterprise?: Those give your attorneys a chat box. This gives your attorneys and your clients one workspace, scoped to the matter, with your firm's knowledge behind the answers and every exchange on the record.
How is this different from Harvey or Legora?: Those are built for the largest firms at enterprise prices. We build the same architecture for firms of 1 to 50 attorneys, at a flat monthly price.
Can a small firm actually afford this?: Yes, that is the point. Flat $490 per month for the whole firm plus a one-time setup from $1,500. Most 5-attorney firms pay more than that for case management software.
Can attorneys review answers before clients see them?: If you want. Full pass-through, daily review, or specific categories held for attorney review. Your policy, and the audit log proves it was followed.
What about conflicts between adverse clients?: Each client is isolated to their own matter at the data layer, not just by policy. Conflict checks run at signup and at session start.
Where does this sit with ABA Formal Opinion 512?: Opinion 512 puts the confidentiality burden on self-learning tools that train on inputs. Our no-training contracts and access controls keep you off that trigger, with an audit log you can hand to ethics counsel.
What if a non-client tries to get in?: They get a polite "contact the firm" page. No engagement letter on file, no answers.

Your clients are already using AI. The only question is whose.

A 30 minute confidential briefing. No commitment, no deck.

Or send us a message

Loading page...

A secured AI workspace for your firm. Privileged by design.

✓ Frontier models, enterprise terms✓ Per-matter access control✓ Logged to the matter file

We're the AI team. Not your lawyers.

✓ Your branding✓ Your data stays yours✓ Everything on the record